Full Transparency

Our Methodology

How we source data, write editorial analysis, verify ownership, rate risk, and maintain independence. Every claim has a process behind it.

Editorial Independence

Blokaro operates with complete editorial independence. We accept no payment, sponsorship, or advertising from any cryptocurrency project, exchange, investment fund, or related entity.

Our editorial team selects what to cover, how to frame analysis, and what severity ratings to assign without any commercial consideration. No project can pay to improve its rating, request removal of critical analysis, or influence how it is presented on this platform.

If a project contacts us to dispute an assessment, we evaluate the evidence they present on its merits — but the final editorial decision rests entirely with our team.

Market Data — Sources & Freshness

All live price, market cap, volume, and supply data is sourced from verified third-party market data providers and updated continuously via automated cron jobs:

SourceData TypeRefresh RateStatus
CoinGecko APIPrices, market cap, volume, supply, ATH/ATL, coin metadataEvery 60 secondsLive
CoinGecko (historical)OHLCV price historyDaily at 02:00 UTCLive
CryptoPanic APINews aggregationEvery 15 minutesLive
Editorial teamOwnership data, analysis, severity ratingsManual — on publicationLive

Data validation

Automated integrity checks run on each data ingestion cycle. Prices that deviate more than 20% from the previous reading in a single cycle are flagged for review before display. We do not display unvalidated data.

All raw API responses are cached in our database with timestamps. If a third-party API is unavailable, we serve the most recently cached data and display its age clearly.

Encyclopedia Research Process

Every encyclopedia entry follows a structured research process before publication:

1
Primary source research
We begin with the original whitepaper, official documentation, and on-chain genesis data. We do not rely on third-party summaries as a primary source.
2
Timeline reconstruction
Key events are sourced from contemporaneous reporting, official announcements, exchange listings, GitHub commit history, and court records where applicable.
3
Ownership & supply verification
Supply data and large wallet holdings are cross-referenced against on-chain explorers. We note where data is estimated versus precisely verifiable.
4
Editorial review
A second editor reviews the entry for accuracy, tone, and appropriate attribution before publication. Contested facts require two independent sources.
5
Ongoing maintenance
Entries are reviewed periodically or when significant events occur. All updates are timestamped. Major revisions are noted.

Inclusion criteria

🪙
Active Currencies
Active trading on at least one major exchange, or independently verifiable network activity within the past 12 months.
💀
Dead Coins
No trading activity for 180+ days, abandoned GitHub, no official communications, or confirmed collapse/exit. Historical significance is sufficient for inclusion.
🔵
Planned Projects
Publicly announced with verifiable whitepaper or technical specification. Vaporware with no documentation is excluded.
⚙️
Technologies
Consensus mechanisms, protocol standards, cryptographic primitives, and infrastructure technologies relevant to the digital asset ecosystem.

Editorial Severity Ratings

Our editorial team assigns severity ratings to specific findings or characteristics of an asset. These are editorial opinions based on available evidence — not investment ratings.

◎ Neutral
Standard characteristic for this asset class. No particular concern or commendation.
✓ Positive
Noteworthy positive characteristic — e.g. exceptional transparency, audited code, strong decentralisation.
⚠ Warning
Factor warranting attention — e.g. high wallet concentration, limited developer activity, unaudited contracts.
✕ Critical
Significant concern based on documented evidence — e.g. confirmed fraud, proven wash trading, known exploit history.

Ratings apply to specific identified findings, not to the asset overall. An asset can have both positive and critical findings simultaneously. All ratings include the evidence or reasoning behind them.

Ownership Data

Wallet ownership and distribution data is sourced from:

Important caveats: Wallet ownership is often pseudonymous. We cannot always verify who controls a wallet — only its balance and transaction history. Where ownership is estimated or inferred rather than directly evidenced, we note this clearly. We distinguish between on-chain verifiable data and attributed ownership.

Dead Coin Verdicts

Our Graveyard section documents defunct, failed, and fraudulent projects. Verdicts are based on a structured assessment:

We distinguish between projects that simply failed (lack of adoption, poor execution) and those that were deliberately fraudulent. Both are documented, but the language differs accordingly.

Corrections Policy

When we get something wrong, we say so — clearly and promptly. Corrections are appended to the relevant entry with a timestamp noting what was changed and why. We do not quietly edit errors or delete content to hide inaccuracies. The original incorrect claim and the correction are both preserved in the editorial record.

To report an error or factual inaccuracy: contact us with your evidence. We review every submission. If the correction is upheld, we publish it within 5 business days.

Known Limitations

We believe in being transparent about what we don't know and can't verify:

If you have primary source material that would improve an entry, we want to hear from you.

Questions about our methodology? Contact the editorial team · About Blokaro · Full Disclaimer